ActiveCampaign
Marketing automation is the job and sales is one person with an inbox.
HubSpot
A sales team works a pipeline in the CRM all day, or you need a free CRM right now.
Free CRM · professional tiers cost several times more
Rounds won
| Round | ActiveCampaign | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Automation depth | More triggers, branching and conditionsWins | Good, less granular |
| Price for serious marketing | Pro $79/mo at 1,000 contactsWins | Several times that, plus an onboarding fee |
| Sales CRM | Pipelines and Sales Engagement are add-ons | Full sales platform includedWins |
| Free plan | None, 14-day trial | A genuinely usable free CRMWins |
| Reporting | Custom reporting extra below Enterprise | Stronger out of the boxWins |
| Contact counting | Every contact counts, unsubscribed included | Marketing and stored contacts priced apartWins |
| Getting started | 14-day trial, no card, no callWins | Professional tiers start with a sales call |
If marketing automation is the job, ActiveCampaign does it better and costs a fraction as much — Pro at $79 against HubSpot's professional marketing tiers is not a close price comparison. If a sales team lives in the CRM all day, HubSpot is the better product and ActiveCampaign's pipelines add-on does not close the gap. The trap is buying ActiveCampaign as a HubSpot replacement and then paying for enough add-ons that you have rebuilt a worse HubSpot.
ActiveCampaign vs HubSpot: which is better in 2026?
ActiveCampaign automates better for less money; HubSpot is the stronger sales platform and prices like one. Which half you need decides it.
How we pay for this
We buy the hardware and pay for the subscriptions we write about. Claim a deal through our link and we may earn a commission — our readers sometimes get a discount or a freebie out of it too, but it never pushes the price up, and it never changes what the review says.
ActiveCampaign is the better marketing-automation product and HubSpot is the better sales platform, and they cost very different amounts. Pro at $79 a month for 1,000 contacts against HubSpot's professional marketing tiers is not a close comparison on price. Whether that saving is real depends entirely on whether you need the half HubSpot is better at.
ActiveCampaign vs HubSpot at a glance
| What you are comparing | ActiveCampaign | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $15/mo at 1,000 contacts | Free CRM tier, paid marketing above it |
| Serious marketing tier | $79/mo Pro at 1,000 contacts | Several times that |
| Automation depth | Deeper, more trigger types, more branching | Good, less granular |
| Sales CRM | Marketing CRM included; pipelines an add-on | Full sales platform, included |
| Free plan | None | Yes, genuinely usable CRM |
| Reporting | Custom reporting an add-on below Enterprise | Stronger out of the box |
| Onboarding fee | None | Historically required on professional tiers |
| Trial | 14 days, no card, 100 sends | Free tier instead |
| Ecosystem and hiring | Smaller | Large, with a certification programme |
Where ActiveCampaign wins outright
The automation builder. ActiveCampaign gives you more trigger types, more branching and finer conditions than HubSpot does at a comparable price, and the gap is widest on behaviour: site visits, link clicks, score thresholds, ecommerce events and tag changes all drive logic natively.
Price is the other clear win, and it is not marginal. A business running lifecycle marketing on 1,000 contacts pays $79 on ActiveCampaign Pro. The equivalent capability on HubSpot's professional marketing tier costs several times that, plus the onboarding fee HubSpot has historically required.
There is also no sales process to get started. ActiveCampaign's trial is 14 days, no card, no call. HubSpot's professional tiers come with a conversation.
Where HubSpot wins outright
The CRM, and this is the thing to be honest about because it is where people get the decision wrong.
HubSpot's sales platform includes pipelines, deal stages, sequences, meeting booking, quotes, forecasting and call logging as part of the product. ActiveCampaign has a marketing CRM in the base plan — contacts, fields, tags, lead scoring — and sells Pipelines and Sales Engagement as enhanced CRM add-ons on Plus, Pro and Enterprise.
So "ActiveCampaign has a CRM" is true and does not mean what a sales director hears. If a team of five people spend their day inside the CRM logging calls and moving deals, HubSpot is the better tool and the price difference starts to look like what it is: a different product.
HubSpot's free tier matters too. A startup can run its CRM on HubSpot for nothing and add marketing later. ActiveCampaign has no permanent free plan, only the 14-day trial.
And reporting. HubSpot's dashboards answer "where did this revenue come from" without an add-on; ActiveCampaign's custom reporting is extra on Plus and Pro and only included at Enterprise.
The trap in the middle
The expensive mistake is buying ActiveCampaign specifically to escape HubSpot's price, then adding pipelines, Sales Engagement, SMS, transactional email and custom reporting until you have assembled something that costs real money and does the sales half less well.
If your add-on list is getting long, stop and price HubSpot properly. The comparison that matters is total cost for the capability you will actually use, and at that point the gap narrows considerably — especially at larger contact counts, where ActiveCampaign Pro is about $375 a month at 10,000 contacts before any add-ons.
The clean version of each choice: ActiveCampaign Pro with no add-ons, for a business whose sales process is email follow-up. HubSpot, for a business with a sales team and a pipeline review every Monday.
Contact counting, on both sides
Both charge by contacts and both have rules worth reading.
ActiveCampaign, for accounts created from 3 November 2025, counts every contact toward the limit regardless of list status — unsubscribed and bounced included. HubSpot distinguishes marketing contacts from stored contacts, so you can hold records you do not market to at a lower cost.
That difference matters most to a business with a large historical database and a smaller active list, and it points the other way from the headline price. If you hold 50,000 records and market to 8,000, HubSpot's model is friendlier and ActiveCampaign's new rule is expensive.
What the reviews say about each
ActiveCampaign scores about 4.6 on Capterra and 4.4 on G2 — strong product ratings — against about 2.7 on Trustpilot with a quarter of reviews at one star. The complaints there are overwhelmingly commercial: price increases, billing and cancellation disputes, difficulty reaching a person.
HubSpot attracts a different complaint, and a consistent one: the price, and how quickly it escalates as seats and contacts grow. Nobody says HubSpot is hard to get support from; plenty say it became unaffordable.
Read together, that is a fair summary of the two companies. One is cheaper and rougher to deal with commercially; the other is expensive and professional about it.
Which should you pick?
- Marketing automation is the job, sales is one person with an inbox. ActiveCampaign Pro. Better automation, a fraction of the price.
- You have a sales team with a pipeline. HubSpot. The CRM is the product and ActiveCampaign's add-on does not match it.
- You are pre-revenue and need a CRM today. HubSpot's free tier, and add marketing when there is marketing to do.
- You hold a large archive and market to a fraction of it. HubSpot, because of how each counts contacts.
- Ecommerce lifecycle marketing. ActiveCampaign, or Klaviyo if the whole business is the store.
- You mainly send newsletters. Neither — see AWeber vs ActiveCampaign for the simpler end of the market.
Our full ActiveCampaign review covers the product in its own right, and the pricing breakdown has every add-on listed if you want to build a like-for-like total.
More in Software
See the whole sector
Build a creator sales pipeline in Bento
A walkthrough of Bento's pipeline columns — Pitched through Booked and Paid — and why the open-tracking alerts are worth paying attention to.
Jotform for nonprofits: tickets and waivers
How charitable organizations and conference hosts collect donations, manage volunteer shifts, and run event registration on a tight budget.
Selling coaching packages straight out of AWeber
Landing pages, Stripe checkout, and automated onboarding: how independent consultants run a coaching business's sales side without five different tools.
Tom Kessler
Senior Editor, Software & Automation · The Comparer
Ten years covering business software, most of it spent inside admin dashboards nobody else wanted to open. Still uses a spreadsheet to track his own subscriptions.
Readers also opened
Bento user reviews: Trustpilot vs Reddit
What Bento users say on Trustpilot (4.6 stars) versus Reddit, and why the two disagree. Our own verdict is in the full Bento review.
AWeber review 2026: is it still worth using?
AWeber has been sending automated emails since before Gmail existed. We spent weeks in the dashboard to see how it holds up against its 2026 competition.
Jotform review 2026: when it earns its keep
Forms, e-signatures, approval chains, even AI agents: where Jotform pulls its weight, where the usage caps start to bite, and whether the paid tiers are worth it.
Cloudways review 2026: what $11 to $99 a month gets you
Cloudways review: managed cloud hosting from $11/mo on DigitalOcean. What you get, real costs, no root access, and who should pick something else.
Kamatera review 2026: flexible cloud VPS with caveats
Kamatera starts at $4/mo with 30 days free, but it is unmanaged infrastructure. What the money buys, what it does not, and the billing rules that catch people.
Rewrite Bento's AI pitch so it sounds like you
Why the out-of-the-box AI pitch gets ignored, and a simple four-part structure for rewriting it so it actually sounds like you wrote it.
How to build an automated welcome sequence in AWeber
A walkthrough for setting up sign-up tags, a five-email nurture sequence, and automatic PDF delivery so new subscribers hear from you right away.
Jotform vs Google Forms: why pay $39 a month?
A practical look at exactly where free Google Forms stops being enough, and where paying for dedicated workflow software starts making sense.
How to find the right person to pitch at a brand
A walkthrough of Bento's search filters — niche, region, and the specific job titles worth targeting, from Influencer Marketing Manager to Head of Growth.
Jotform AI Agents tested: do they beat a form?
We built agents for customer service, lead qualification, and payment intake to see where the format actually holds up and where it doesn't.
ActiveCampaign vs Mailchimp: which should you pick?
Mailchimp is easier and has a free tier. ActiveCampaign automates far more and starts at $15. The honest split is whether you send campaigns or run journeys.
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: is the managed markup worth it?
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: the same 2 GB Droplet costs $12 direct and $24 on Cloudways. What the extra $12 buys, and when running it yourself wins.