Kamatera
You need dedicated cores, Windows, or servers outside Hetzner's five locations.
Hetzner
You run European sites on shared CPU and want the most hardware and traffic per euro.
CX23 €5.49/mo · CCX13 €42.99/mo
Rounds won
| Round | Kamatera | Hetzner |
|---|---|---|
| Entry shared server | 1 vCPU, 1 GB, 20 GB for $4 | 2 vCPU, 4 GB, 40 GB for €5.49Wins |
| Included traffic | 5 TB per server | 20 TB per server in the EUWins |
| Dedicated cores | Type D, cheaper to reachWins | CCX13, now €42.99 |
| Windows | Server and Desktop, licence includedWins | Not offered |
| Locations | 18 across five continentsWins | Five |
| Custom hardware shapes | CPU, RAM and disk set separatelyWins | Fixed plans |
| Automatic backups | Manual snapshots unless scripted | Scheduled backups as an optionWins |
| Reaching a person | Phone supportWins | Tickets only |
Hetzner still wins on shared-vCPU value in Europe — a CX23 is more hardware per euro than anything Kamatera sells. Kamatera now wins on dedicated cores, on anything that needs Windows, and anywhere outside Hetzner's four regions, and the June 2026 rise widened that second gap considerably.
Kamatera vs Hetzner after the 2026 price rise
Hetzner's June 2026 increase pushed CCX dedicated plans up sharply while entry CX servers barely moved. That splits the answer in two.
How we pay for this
We buy the hardware and pay for the subscriptions we write about. Claim a deal through our link and we may earn a commission — our readers sometimes get a discount or a freebie out of it too, but it never pushes the price up, and it never changes what the review says.
Hetzner is still the cheapest way to rent shared CPU in Europe, and after June 2026 it is no longer the cheapest way to rent a dedicated one. Hetzner's own price-adjustment notice lists CCX13 moving from €15.99 to €42.99 a month, and CPX22 from €7.99 to €19.49, effective 15 June 2026. Entry CX plans moved far less — CX23 went from €3.99 to €5.49. That split is the whole story of this comparison.
If you only ever buy the cheapest shared instance, nothing much has changed and Hetzner still wins. If you buy dedicated vCPU, or you need Windows, or your users are not in Germany, Kamatera is now a serious candidate where a year ago it was an also-ran.
Kamatera vs Hetzner at a glance
| What you are comparing | Kamatera | Hetzner Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Entry shared server | $4 — 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM, 20 GB NVMe, 5 TB traffic | €5.49 (CX23) — 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, 40 GB NVMe, 20 TB traffic |
| Dedicated vCPU, entry | Type D on the standard configurator | CCX13, listed at €42.99 after the June 2026 rise |
| Included traffic | 5 TB per server | 20 TB per server in EU locations |
| Custom hardware shapes | CPU, RAM and disk are separate sliders | Fixed plans only |
| Windows | Server and Desktop, licensing handled | Not offered |
| Locations | 18, across five continents | Germany, Finland, two US sites, Singapore |
| Price transparency | Storage and traffic published; Windows licensing is not | Full plan table, and changes published with old and new figures |
Shared vCPU: Hetzner, and it is not close
A Hetzner CX23 is two shared Intel cores, 4 GB of RAM, 40 GB of NVMe and 20 TB of traffic for €5.49 a month excluding VAT. To approach that memory and disk on Kamatera you are well past $20. On raw hardware per unit of currency, nothing in this market beats Hetzner's cost-optimised line, and pretending otherwise would be silly.
The traffic allowance matters as much as the hardware. Hetzner includes 20 TB in its EU locations; Kamatera includes 5 TB and charges $0.01 per GB after that. For a media-heavy site that is a meaningful difference — 10 TB of overage on Kamatera is $100 a month, which dwarfs the server.
Where Kamatera claws something back at this end is the shape. Hetzner sells you 2 vCPU with 4 GB bolted to it; if your workload wants 1 core and 8 GB, Hetzner's answer is a bigger plan. Kamatera's answer is to move one slider. That is worth real money on a cache or a search index, and nothing at all on a general web server.
Dedicated vCPU: the part that changed in June
Hetzner's CCX line is dedicated-core instances, and it took the steepest increase in the June 2026 adjustment — Hetzner's own figures put CCX13 at €42.99, up from €15.99. CPX22 went from €7.99 to €19.49. For anyone whose workload actually needs consistent CPU — a database under sustained load, a CI runner, video transcoding — the European bargain is considerably less of one than it was.
Kamatera's Type D is dedicated CPU offered as a choice on the same configurator as everything else, rather than a separate premium family with its own price list. You pick dedicated, you pick how many cores, you pick the memory separately. For the specific case of "I need two reliable cores and not much else", that now prices better than CCX13 does, which was not true in 2025.
Geography, and who you are actually serving
Hetzner runs Germany, Finland, two US sites and Singapore. That is enough for a European business and workable for a North American one. It is not enough if your users are in Israel, Romania, Spain, Italy, Australia or Hong Kong, all of which Kamatera covers among its 18 locations.
This is the least arguable difference in the comparison. Physics beats benchmarks: a modest server 20 ms away serves a user better than a fast one 200 ms away, and no amount of CPU fixes the round trip. If your market is one Hetzner does not have a site in, the hardware comparison above is mostly irrelevant.
The balancing fact is that Hetzner's network inside its own regions is excellent, and its private networking and load balancers are well built and cheap. Within Germany or Finland, a Hetzner cluster is both faster and easier to wire up than the equivalent on Kamatera.
Windows and commercial software
Hetzner does not offer Windows images. Kamatera does, with licensing included, which makes it one of a short list of hosts where a legitimately licensed Windows Server costs under $30 a month. If any part of your stack is a Windows application, this ends the comparison on its own — see our Windows VPS review for sensible sizing, because the Linux entry price does not carry over.
Backups, snapshots and getting the data back
Both hosts charge for snapshots and both bill them by stored size, so the difference is not the price. It is what happens around them.
Hetzner has scheduled automatic backups as a per-server option, priced as a percentage of the server cost, with a rolling set of restore points you do not have to think about. That is the better default for someone who will otherwise forget. Kamatera's snapshots are manual unless you script them, which means they are exactly as reliable as the cron job you wrote and never tested.
Neither one is a backup strategy on its own, and this is worth saying plainly because it catches people on both platforms: a snapshot stored by your host survives your mistake and does not survive your host's. Account suspension, a billing dispute, a region incident — in all three cases the snapshot is on the wrong side of the problem. Something offsite, restored at least once to prove it works, is the actual requirement, and it is identical work on either provider.
Support, and who you can reach
Kamatera answers the phone. Reviewers consistently describe reaching an engineer who can act on routing, DNS and firewall questions, which at this price is unusual — we went through what customers report in our look at Kamatera's public reviews.
Hetzner is ticket-only and the responses are competent, terse and sometimes slow. For a self-sufficient team that is fine; most Hetzner problems are solved by reading rather than asking. If you expect to need a human in a hurry, that is a real difference and it favours Kamatera.
Both draw the same boundary on unmanaged plans: they will help with the platform, not with your server. Neither will log in and fix your nginx config.
Getting an account open
Hetzner screens new accounts hard, and a first signup held for manual identity review is a common enough experience to be worth planning around. It usually clears within a day, but "usually" is uncomfortable when you are trying to ship something.
Kamatera's path is generally smoother, though it has its own version of this: a fully refundable $10 deposit is sometimes requested during the free trial in place of card verification, and customers who cannot complete 3D Secure can start on a prepaid account instead. Refundable and documented, but still a step nobody expects on a free trial — our trial guide covers it.
Which host should you choose?
- A European site on a budget, shared CPU, lots of bandwidth. Hetzner. The CX line is the best hardware-per-euro on the market and the 20 TB allowance is generous.
- Anything needing dedicated cores. Kamatera, post-June-2026. Type D reaches dedicated CPU for less than CCX13 now costs.
- Windows, in any form. Kamatera, because Hetzner does not sell it.
- Users outside Germany, Finland, Virginia, Oregon or Singapore. Kamatera, for the location list.
- An unusual memory-to-core ratio. Kamatera, because Hetzner's plans are fixed.
- Infrastructure as code, with a mature provider and clean APIs. Hetzner. Its tooling is the better-built of the two.
Both are honest products that are upfront about being unmanaged. If your answer landed on Kamatera, the 30-day trial covers one server up to $100 and 1 TB of traffic. The full review explains the billing rules worth knowing first, and Kamatera vs DigitalOcean is the comparison to read if managed databases matter more to you than the price per core.
More in Hosting & cloud
See the whole sectorNamecheap vs Hostinger: which cheap host wins?
Two budget hosts with very different pricing shapes. Namecheap renews annually from $55.88; Hostinger's headline price needs a long term paid upfront.
How to speed up WordPress on Cloudways: 9 settings to check
How to speed up WordPress on Cloudways: measure first, then the Lightning Stack, PHP version, Breeze, Varnish, Redis and Object Cache Pro, a CDN and real cron.
Adam Ferris
Cloud & Infrastructure Writer · The Comparer
Spent a few years keeping servers online at an ad-tech company that doesn't exist anymore. Rents GPU time the way other people rent power tools.
Readers also opened
Bento user reviews: Trustpilot vs Reddit
What Bento users say on Trustpilot (4.6 stars) versus Reddit, and why the two disagree. Our own verdict is in the full Bento review.
AWeber review 2026: is it still worth using?
AWeber has been sending automated emails since before Gmail existed. We spent weeks in the dashboard to see how it holds up against its 2026 competition.
Jotform review 2026: when it earns its keep
Forms, e-signatures, approval chains, even AI agents: where Jotform pulls its weight, where the usage caps start to bite, and whether the paid tiers are worth it.
Cloudways review 2026: what $11 to $99 a month gets you
Cloudways review: managed cloud hosting from $11/mo on DigitalOcean. What you get, real costs, no root access, and who should pick something else.
Kamatera review 2026: flexible cloud VPS with caveats
Kamatera starts at $4/mo with 30 days free, but it is unmanaged infrastructure. What the money buys, what it does not, and the billing rules that catch people.
Rewrite Bento's AI pitch so it sounds like you
Why the out-of-the-box AI pitch gets ignored, and a simple four-part structure for rewriting it so it actually sounds like you wrote it.
How to build an automated welcome sequence in AWeber
A walkthrough for setting up sign-up tags, a five-email nurture sequence, and automatic PDF delivery so new subscribers hear from you right away.
Jotform vs Google Forms: why pay $39 a month?
A practical look at exactly where free Google Forms stops being enough, and where paying for dedicated workflow software starts making sense.
How to find the right person to pitch at a brand
A walkthrough of Bento's search filters — niche, region, and the specific job titles worth targeting, from Influencer Marketing Manager to Head of Growth.
Jotform AI Agents tested: do they beat a form?
We built agents for customer service, lead qualification, and payment intake to see where the format actually holds up and where it doesn't.
ActiveCampaign vs Mailchimp: which should you pick?
Mailchimp is easier and has a free tier. ActiveCampaign automates far more and starts at $15. The honest split is whether you send campaigns or run journeys.
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: is the managed markup worth it?
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: the same 2 GB Droplet costs $12 direct and $24 on Cloudways. What the extra $12 buys, and when running it yourself wins.