Consumer VPN services
Best for: Mullvad at a flat €5 a month is the honest one: no introductory rate, no renewal jump, no account to speak of. NordVPN is faster, has far more servers and the longest audit record, but its cheap two-year price roughly quadruples on renewal. Proton sits between them and is the pick if you want a VPN attached to a mail account you already trust.
- Mullvad charges the same €5 whether you pay monthly or for a year, so there is no renewal cliff and no account email required
- NordVPN has been through more independent no-logs assessments than any competitor and has the server count to match
- Proton VPN's two-year rate undercuts NordVPN's and comes from a company whose main business is already encrypted mail
- All three run audited, open-source clients on the major platforms
- NordVPN's advertised $3.09 is a first-term rate — the two-year plan renews at roughly $139 a year, which is about four times the introductory monthly equivalent
- Mullvad's 582-odd servers against NordVPN's five figures shows up as fewer options for streaming and region-hopping
- A VPN does nothing about the tracking most people actually face, which is in the browser and the account, not the network
- Any provider's no-logs claim is a promise plus an audit, never a proof
The VPNs worth paying for in 2026, and the renewal trap
Headline VPN prices are a first-term discount. What matters is the renewal rate, the audit history, and whether you need one at all — often you do not.
How we pay for this
We buy the hardware and pay for the subscriptions we write about. Claim a deal through our link and we may earn a commission — our readers sometimes get a discount or a freebie out of it too, but it never pushes the price up, and it never changes what the review says.
Before the comparison, the question most VPN articles skip: do you need one? If your threat model is "the café wifi", modern HTTPS already covers almost all of it. If it is "advertisers following me", a VPN does close to nothing — that tracking happens in the browser and in the accounts you are signed into, and it follows you through the tunnel.
A VPN genuinely helps with four things: hiding which sites you visit from whoever runs your network, hiding your home address from the sites you visit, getting a connection that is not subject to your ISP's shaping or blocking, and appearing to be somewhere else. If none of those is your problem, the correct number of VPNs to buy is zero, and the correct amount of money to spend on this article's recommendations is nothing.
The renewal price is the whole story
Every advertised VPN price is a first-term rate. The number on the comparison table is what you pay for the first two years; the number on the invoice after that is different, and it is the one that decides what this actually costs you.
NordVPN's two-year plan works out around $3.09 a month. That is genuinely cheap. The renewal is roughly $139 a year — call it $11.60 a month, close to four times the rate that got you in. Nothing about that is hidden, and nothing about it is unusual in this industry, but it is the figure to compare against and nobody puts it on the pricing page.
Proton VPN plays the same game slightly more cheaply, around $2.99 a month on a two-year term.
Mullvad does not play it at all: €5 a month, every month, whether you pay for one month or twelve. There is no discount for committing and no penalty for not. Over three years Mullvad is more expensive than NordVPN's first term and cheaper than its renewal, and you always know which it is.
What you are buying beyond the tunnel
| What matters | Mullvad | NordVPN | Proton VPN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing shape | Flat €5/mo, no terms | $3.09/mo first term, ~$139/yr after | From $2.99/mo on two years |
| Account needed | A generated number, no email | Email account | Proton account |
| Server footprint | Hundreds | Thousands, widest coverage | Thousands |
| Independent no-logs audits | Audited | The longest record of the three | Audited |
| Streaming region unblocking | Unreliable, and not a goal | The most consistent | Workable |
| Pays with cash in an envelope | Yes, genuinely | No | No |
Why Mullvad is the one we keep recommending
It is not the fastest and it does not have the most servers. What it has is the smallest gap between what it claims and what it can be held to. There is no email address on the account — you get a generated number. There is no first-term discount to renew out of. You can pay in cash. The client is open source and the company has been audited.
That combination means less of your trust is doing load-bearing work. Every VPN's no-logs promise is a promise; an audit raises your confidence in it but cannot prove a negative about what a company does tomorrow. Mullvad's design means there is simply less identifying information for a promise to be made about.
The honest downside is real, though: a few hundred servers against NordVPN's thousands means more occasions where the exit you want is busy or the service you are trying to reach has blocked the address. If region-hopping for streaming is why you are buying a VPN, Mullvad will annoy you and NordVPN will not.
Where NordVPN earns its price
Coverage and consistency. If you need an exit in a specific country, want it to work with a streaming service this month, and would rather not think about it, NordVPN is the one that behaves. It has also submitted to independent no-logs assessment more times than any competitor, which is a meaningful signal — repeated audits are harder to stage than one.
Just buy it knowing the renewal. Set a reminder before the term ends; this is a market where cancelling and re-subscribing as a new customer is, irritatingly, often cheaper than renewing.
Self-hosting, and what it does and does not fix
Running WireGuard on a cheap VPS is the enthusiast's answer, and it solves exactly one problem well: you get an IP address nobody else is using, so you stop being blocked for what a stranger did from the same exit.
Be clear about what it does not solve. Your hosting provider can see your traffic volumes and has your name on an invoice, which is strictly worse than Mullvad's account number. And a VPN with one user is a far better fingerprint than one shared with fifty thousand — the crowd is the privacy. Self-hosting buys a clean address, not anonymity.
If a clean address is what you are after, our VPS setup guide and cloud firewall walkthrough cover the build, and it runs on a $4 server. For application-layer web security at the edge, our Cloudways Cloudflare Enterprise review analyzes WAF and DDoS mitigation.
The things a VPN is not
Worth stating plainly, because the marketing in this category is the least honest part of consumer software:
- It is not antivirus. The bundled "threat protection" features in consumer VPNs are mostly DNS blocklists. Useful, not a security product.
- It does not stop ad tracking. You are signed into the accounts doing the tracking. A browser that blocks third-party cookies does more for this than any VPN.
- It does not make illegal things legal, and the providers' own terms say so.
- It does not protect you from the endpoint. If the site you are visiting is hostile, encrypting the path to it changes nothing.
What to buy
- Privacy is the actual reason. Mullvad. Flat price, no email, cash accepted, nothing to renew out of.
- You want it to work with streaming and you will not think about it again. NordVPN — with a calendar reminder before renewal.
- You already use Proton Mail. Proton VPN, for one bill and one account.
- You want a clean IP for scraping or testing, not privacy. Neither — you want a proxy provider, and our proxy comparison is the right piece.
- Your threat model is public wifi. Honestly, nothing. HTTPS has this covered.
More in Privacy & data
See the whole sectorPriya Anand
Staff Writer, Security & Software · The Comparer
Started in IT support before moving into writing, which is why she still reads terms of service for fun. Tests everything on a burner account first.
Readers also opened
Bento user reviews: Trustpilot vs Reddit
What Bento users say on Trustpilot (4.6 stars) versus Reddit, and why the two disagree. Our own verdict is in the full Bento review.
AWeber review 2026: is it still worth using?
AWeber has been sending automated emails since before Gmail existed. We spent weeks in the dashboard to see how it holds up against its 2026 competition.
Jotform review 2026: when it earns its keep
Forms, e-signatures, approval chains, even AI agents: where Jotform pulls its weight, where the usage caps start to bite, and whether the paid tiers are worth it.
Cloudways review 2026: what $11 to $99 a month gets you
Cloudways review: managed cloud hosting from $11/mo on DigitalOcean. What you get, real costs, no root access, and who should pick something else.
Kamatera review 2026: flexible cloud VPS with caveats
Kamatera starts at $4/mo with 30 days free, but it is unmanaged infrastructure. What the money buys, what it does not, and the billing rules that catch people.
Rewrite Bento's AI pitch so it sounds like you
Why the out-of-the-box AI pitch gets ignored, and a simple four-part structure for rewriting it so it actually sounds like you wrote it.
How to build an automated welcome sequence in AWeber
A walkthrough for setting up sign-up tags, a five-email nurture sequence, and automatic PDF delivery so new subscribers hear from you right away.
Jotform vs Google Forms: why pay $39 a month?
A practical look at exactly where free Google Forms stops being enough, and where paying for dedicated workflow software starts making sense.
How to find the right person to pitch at a brand
A walkthrough of Bento's search filters — niche, region, and the specific job titles worth targeting, from Influencer Marketing Manager to Head of Growth.
Jotform AI Agents tested: do they beat a form?
We built agents for customer service, lead qualification, and payment intake to see where the format actually holds up and where it doesn't.
ActiveCampaign vs Mailchimp: which should you pick?
Mailchimp is easier and has a free tier. ActiveCampaign automates far more and starts at $15. The honest split is whether you send campaigns or run journeys.
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: is the managed markup worth it?
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: the same 2 GB Droplet costs $12 direct and $24 on Cloudways. What the extra $12 buys, and when running it yourself wins.