Residential proxy networks
Best for: Bright Data has the largest network and the most compliance paperwork, and charges accordingly — it is what you buy when procurement will ask questions. The mid-market providers cost meaningfully less per gigabyte for the same job. Start with datacentre proxies and only pay residential rates once you have proved you actually need them, which perhaps half of projects do not.
- Bright Data's network size means fewer blocked requests on the hardest targets, and its compliance documentation is the most complete in the category
- Pay-as-you-go tiers mean a small project does not need a committed contract
- Datacentre proxies cost a fraction of residential rates and are enough for a large share of real jobs
- The serious providers now publish how they source addresses, which was not true a few years ago
- Per-gigabyte pricing punishes inefficient scraping brutally — rendering a page with images can cost 50 times what fetching its HTML costs
- Bright Data is among the most expensive per gigabyte and its pricing page is hard to translate into a monthly figure
- Residential networks source addresses from people running an SDK inside some other app, and how clearly they consented varies by provider
- Know-your-customer checks mean signup is not instant, which is a surprise if you expected to start in ten minutes
Bright Data vs Oxylabs vs Decodo: which proxies?
Residential proxies are sold by the gigabyte, and a page weighs far more than people estimate. How the pricing works, and how the networks get their addresses.
How we pay for this
We buy the hardware and pay for the subscriptions we write about. Claim a deal through our link and we may earn a commission — our readers sometimes get a discount or a freebie out of it too, but it never pushes the price up, and it never changes what the review says.
Residential proxies are billed by the gigabyte, and almost everybody underestimates how many gigabytes their scraper will use. That single fact decides more about what a project costs than which provider you pick, so it is worth getting straight before comparing anybody's rate card.
A page's HTML is usually tens of kilobytes. The same page rendered in a headless browser — images, fonts, stylesheets, analytics, video thumbnails — is routinely two to five megabytes. At residential rates that is the difference between a job costing pennies and the same job costing tens of pounds, for identical results.
The three kinds, and when each is right
- Datacentre proxies. Addresses belonging to hosting providers, sold by everyone here including Bright Data and Oxylabs. Cheap, fast, and obvious to anyone looking — a site that cares can identify and block the whole range. Right for targets that do not block aggressively, which is more of them than the proxy industry's marketing implies.
- Residential proxies. Addresses belonging to real home connections, routed through consumer devices. Expensive, slower, and much harder to distinguish from an ordinary visitor. Right when datacentre addresses are being blocked and you have confirmed that is the actual problem.
- Mobile proxies. Addresses from carrier networks. The most expensive by a distance, and genuinely hard to block because carriers put thousands of real users behind one address. Reserve these for targets where nothing else works.
The order matters. Start at the top and move down only when you have evidence, because each step up roughly multiplies the cost.
Where the providers actually differ
| What you are comparing | Bright Data | Oxylabs | Decodo, IPRoyal and similar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network size | Largest in the category | Very large | Smaller, adequate for most targets |
| Price per GB | At the top of the market | High | Often less than half |
| Entry commitment | Pay-as-you-go available, enterprise-shaped above it | Similar | Low minimums |
| Compliance documentation | The most thorough | Thorough | Varies widely — read it |
| Ready-made scrapers and parsers | Extensive | Extensive | Limited |
| Who it suits | Companies whose legal team will ask | The same, slightly cheaper | Teams spending their own money |
The unglamorous conclusion is that for most jobs the mid-market providers do the same work for considerably less. The premium providers earn their price in two specific situations: targets with serious anti-bot defences where network size genuinely decides success rates, and organisations where somebody will eventually ask for documentation about where the addresses came from.
How residential networks get their addresses
This is the part worth understanding before you sign anything, because it is where the category's reputational problem lives.
Residential traffic is routed through real consumer devices. Those devices are enrolled either by paying people directly — the clearest case — or, far more often, through an SDK embedded in some other application: a free VPN, a mobile game, a browser extension. The user agreed to something when they installed it, and how clearly that something explained "your connection will be used to route other people's traffic" varies enormously between providers.
The larger providers now publish their sourcing practices and run compliance programmes, which is a genuine improvement on where this market was a few years ago. The cheapest end of the market mostly does not, and the price difference is partly explained by that.
If you are buying for a company, this is a due-diligence item rather than a philosophical one: ask how addresses are sourced, ask for the consent language shown to those users, and keep the answer. If a provider cannot answer, that is the answer.
Spending less by scraping better
Because billing is by the gigabyte, the cheapest optimisation is almost never switching provider. It is sending and receiving less.
- Do not render unless you must. A headless browser downloads everything a real browser downloads. If the data is in the initial HTML — and surprisingly often it is, or it is in a JSON endpoint the page calls — fetching that directly costs a fraction of rendering the page.
- Block images, fonts, media and analytics when you do render. One request interceptor rule typically cuts page weight by most of it, and nothing you wanted was in a web font.
- Find the API. Many sites load their content from a JSON endpoint the page itself calls. Watching the network tab for ten minutes can replace a megabyte of rendered page with a few kilobytes of structured data, and it is more reliable to parse.
- Cache aggressively and re-request nothing. Store what you fetched, deduplicate your queue, and resume rather than restart. A crawler that re-fetches 30% of its pages after a crash is paying 30% more than it needs to.
- Route by difficulty. Send the easy targets through datacentre proxies and reserve residential for the ones that actually block you. Most crawls have a long tail of undefended pages paying premium rates for no reason.
Teams that do these five things routinely cut proxy spend by most of it, which is a larger saving than any provider's discount.
What signup is actually like
Not instant, and this surprises people. The reputable providers run know-your-customer checks — company details, intended use, sometimes a call — because the alternative is their network being used for credential stuffing. Budget a day or two before you can send traffic, and expect to describe your use case in writing.
That friction is a feature rather than a bug: a provider that lets anyone start scraping anonymously in ten minutes is a provider whose address pool is being used for things that will get it blocked, which becomes your problem in the form of worse success rates.
The legal line, stated plainly
We are not lawyers and this is not advice. What can be said usefully: the proxy is the least interesting part of the legal question. What matters is what you collect, what you do with it, and whose terms you agreed to. Public data, personal data and copyrighted data are three different conversations, and the jurisdiction you and the target are in changes all of them.
A proxy provider's compliance documentation covers how it sources its addresses. It does not transfer to you any permission regarding what you collect through them, and no provider claims otherwise in its own terms.
What to pick
- A small project, a target that does not block much. Datacentre proxies from any reputable provider. Do not pay residential rates until you have measured a block rate that justifies them.
- Mid-size work, your own money. A mid-market residential provider with a low minimum. The per-gigabyte saving against the big two is the largest single lever you have.
- A company where legal will ask. Bright Data or Oxylabs, for the documentation as much as the network.
- A target that defeats everything else. Mobile proxies, for that target only, routed separately so the rest of the crawl does not pay for it.
- You want a clean IP for yourself rather than scale. A proxy is the wrong product — see our VPN comparison, or self-host on a cheap server with our VPS setup guide.
Whichever you choose, the machine running the crawler matters less than people think — this is an I/O-bound job, not a CPU-bound one. A small server is fine, and our breakdown of what a cheap VPS actually costs covers the sums.
More in Privacy & data
See the whole sectorPriya Anand
Staff Writer, Security & Software · The Comparer
Started in IT support before moving into writing, which is why she still reads terms of service for fun. Tests everything on a burner account first.
Readers also opened
Bento user reviews: Trustpilot vs Reddit
What Bento users say on Trustpilot (4.6 stars) versus Reddit, and why the two disagree. Our own verdict is in the full Bento review.
AWeber review 2026: is it still worth using?
AWeber has been sending automated emails since before Gmail existed. We spent weeks in the dashboard to see how it holds up against its 2026 competition.
Jotform review 2026: when it earns its keep
Forms, e-signatures, approval chains, even AI agents: where Jotform pulls its weight, where the usage caps start to bite, and whether the paid tiers are worth it.
Cloudways review 2026: what $11 to $99 a month gets you
Cloudways review: managed cloud hosting from $11/mo on DigitalOcean. What you get, real costs, no root access, and who should pick something else.
Kamatera review 2026: flexible cloud VPS with caveats
Kamatera starts at $4/mo with 30 days free, but it is unmanaged infrastructure. What the money buys, what it does not, and the billing rules that catch people.
Rewrite Bento's AI pitch so it sounds like you
Why the out-of-the-box AI pitch gets ignored, and a simple four-part structure for rewriting it so it actually sounds like you wrote it.
How to build an automated welcome sequence in AWeber
A walkthrough for setting up sign-up tags, a five-email nurture sequence, and automatic PDF delivery so new subscribers hear from you right away.
Jotform vs Google Forms: why pay $39 a month?
A practical look at exactly where free Google Forms stops being enough, and where paying for dedicated workflow software starts making sense.
How to find the right person to pitch at a brand
A walkthrough of Bento's search filters — niche, region, and the specific job titles worth targeting, from Influencer Marketing Manager to Head of Growth.
Jotform AI Agents tested: do they beat a form?
We built agents for customer service, lead qualification, and payment intake to see where the format actually holds up and where it doesn't.
ActiveCampaign vs Mailchimp: which should you pick?
Mailchimp is easier and has a free tier. ActiveCampaign automates far more and starts at $15. The honest split is whether you send campaigns or run journeys.
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: is the managed markup worth it?
Cloudways vs DigitalOcean: the same 2 GB Droplet costs $12 direct and $24 on Cloudways. What the extra $12 buys, and when running it yourself wins.